508
a standing rule that Cadets are never to be sent by mail steamer out always by intermediate (1st class).
E.C.S.
Indian feeling seems to have changed as Indian feeling seems to be that
I am sure that
I.C.S.,
no Indian Civilian nowadays would write himself any more than "M.A." Out of India I have never heard of anyone being addressed on a letter as "I.C.S." In India, the correct address is So and so Esq C.S.
I doubt the desirability of pandering to this morbid affection for alphabetical affixes and there are special objections to the present proposal.
We ought not, I think, to recognise any right on the part of the Cadet Officers to call themselves "The Civil Service" to the exclusion of other equally important branches of the service. They have no more claim to monopolise the name than have the holders of Class 1 appointments in England. Even if "E.C.S." were recognised as standing for "Eastern Cadet Service" it would be open to objection. Such men as Mr Delfield, Mr Wray, Mr Ebden, Mr Hazeland were not Cadets and so could not use the initials and the increased dignity of the service would be compensated for by a loss of dignity owing to these high officers being apparently written down as of a lower caste. The same observation would apply also to a Col Sec: introduced from without the service.
Further unless Ceylon is included, the word "Eastern" would be a misnomer. To include Ceylon would seem to imply a closer connection than can exist between the Ceylon service and that of the other Eastern Colonies and would strengthen the claims of the Ceylon service to be paid on exactly the same scale as the other service.
I cannot see that any such title is needed. In their Colonies everyone knows who these gentlemen are: outside nobody cares.
If they must have an affix, there is no reason why every Civil Servant should not have C.S after his name when he is in the Colony, and, as a matter of fact, the newspapers frequently so describe them, in the Ceylon case writing "C.C.S."; but this practice needs no official sanction.
W 24/1.
My personal opinion is that a Civil Servant can travel 2nd class by steamer.
The prestige which, however ridiculous the matter is in itself, will unfairly besmirch the position of future holders hereafter, I agree with Mr Stubbs' quotation.
2. The E.C.S. is not! M Stubbs
Pr. 2111
what is the average difference in 1st class fares to Ceylon by maild steamers and Intermediate steamers.
508
a standing rule that Cadets are never to be sent by
mai. steamer out always by intermediate (1st lass).
E.C.S.
Indian feeling seems to have changed as Indian feeling seems to
I all!
sure that
I.CS BG,S,"
no Indian Civilian nowadays would write himself
any more than "M.A." Out of India I have never heard of
anyone being addressed on a letter as "1.0.S." In India,
יז
the correct address is So and so Esq C.S.
"
I doubt the desirability of pandering to this morbid affect
ion for alphabetical afiixes and there are special objections
to the present proposal.
We ought not I think, to recognise any right on the part of
1
the Cadet Officers to cail themselves "Che Civil Service"
to the exclusion of other equally important branches of
the service. They have no more claim to monopolise the name
than have the holders of Class 1 appointments in England. Even if
"E.C.5" Zven/17/74/0/8/7/were recognised as standing for "Eastern
Cadet service" it would be open to objection. Such men as
r Delfield, Mr Wray, Mr Ebden, Mr Hazeland were not Cadets
And so could not use the initials and the increased dignity
More than
of the service would be compensated for by a loss of dignity
A
owing to these high officers being apparently written down
as of a lower caste. The same observation would apply also
to a Col Sec: introduced from without the service.
Further unles. Ceylon is included, the word "Eastern" would
a misnomer. To include Ceylon would seem to imply a
closer connection than can exist between the Ceylon service
and that of the other Eastern Colonies and would strengthen
the claims of the Ceylon service to be paid on exactly the
same scale as the other service.
I cannot see that any sucn title is needed. In their
Colonies everyone knows who these gentlemen are: outside
of nobody cares.
If they must have an affix. there is no reason why every
Civil Servant should not have C.S after his name when he
is in the Colony, and, as a matter of fact, the newspapera
frequently so describe them, in the Ceylon case writing
"C.C.S."; but this practice needs no official sanction,
W 24/1.
My personal & peneine is that a
Cind bersant camesh travel 2nd class by steamed a
love
the
7
Arestige
which,
Ridiculos
matter is in itself, will unfair bes
position Fusefuluers herefter, I agree with
tw Stuens ootation
2. The E.S.s is not! M Stubbs
Pr. 2111
what is the average difference in 1st class faves to the 3 Glonia by maild
Clot 2
Intermediak stamens.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.